Governed by: Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China
Sponsored by: Northwestern Polytechnical University  Chinese Society Aeronautics and Astronautics
Address: Aviation Building,Youyi Campus, Northwestern Polytechnical University
Challenges of Implementation of Predictive Maintenance from the Perspective of Aviation Equipment Maintenance Experiences
Affiliation:

1.92925 Unit of PLA,Changzhi,Shanxi,046400;2.China

Clc Number:

V37

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [31]
  • | | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Predictive maintenance (PdM) can improve the aviation equipment readiness in minimal cost, and PdM is also one key enabler to agile combat support. Problems and challenges were analyzed from the perspective of maintenance and support practices in this paper. Firstly, three maintenance methods were compared and each of their suitability was discussed. Secondly, organizations, events, and forms involved in PdM were analyzed. Then, problems against implementation of PdM were summarized in terms of reduction of the maintenance workload and improvement of aviation equipment readiness. The effects of the maintenance information system were also evaluated. Challenges were explained from the perspective of personnel resource, repair parts supply, technical and organizational culture. Lastly, some suggestions were proposed to implement the PdM in our aviation equipment maintenance and support.

    Reference
    [1] .顾新, 刘松岑. 以预测性为中心的维修理论和维修方式发展研究[J]. 航空工程进展, 2021, 12(5): 7-14.
    [2] .U.S. Government Accountability Office. Weapon System Sustainment: Aircraft Mission Capable Goals Were Generally Not Met and Sustainment Costs Varied by Aircraft [R]. GAO-23-106217. Washington, D.C.: Nov. 10, 2022.
    [3] .U.S. Government Accountability Office. F-35 Sustainment: DOD Faces Several Uncertainties and Has Not Met Key Objectives [R]. GAO-22-105995. Washington, D.C.: April. 28, 2022.
    [4] .U.S. Government Accountability Office. Military Readiness: Actions Needed to Further Implement Predictive Maintenance on Weapon Systems [R]. GAO-23-105556. Washington, D.C.: April. 28, 2022.
    [5] .Andreas Theissler, Judith Pérez-Velázquez, Marcel Kettelgerdes, et al. Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases and challenges in the automotive industry [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 215 (2021) 107864.
    [6] .张宝珍,王萍.飞机PHM技术发展近况及在F-35应用中遇到的问题及挑战[J].航空科学技术,2020, 31(7):18-26.
    [7] .Li Ang Zhang, Yusuf Ashpari, Anthony Jacques. Understanding the Limits of Artificial Intelligence for Warfighters, Volume 3: Predictive Maintenance [R]. Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif, 2024.
    [8] .赵强. 基于CBM维修理论的航空装备维修保障初探[J].航空维修工程, 2020, 3:73-76.
    [9] .Michael J. Scott, Wim J. C. Verhagen, Marie T. Bieber, et al. A Systematic Literature Review of Predictive Maintenance for Defense Fixed-Wing Aircraft Sustainment and Operations [J]. Sensors, 2022, 22, 7070.
    [10] .张浩驰, 张星一, 崔赟, 等. 基于数据驱动的航空装备生产系统PHM方法与应用系统设计[J].航空科学技术,2023, 34(11):81-86.
    [11] .黄劲东.面向预测性维修构建航空发动机综合监控和健康管理系统[J].航空动力, 2022, 5: 74-78.
    [12] .孔旭, 于得水, 丁坤英, 等. 航空器预测性维修技术研发应用态势分析[J]. 航空工程进展, 2021, 12(2): 21-29.
    [13] .王美慧. 预测性维修技术的发展障碍[J]. 航空维修与工程, 2020, 6: 19-20.
    [14] .宋海方,刘洁,汪时交,等.深度学习在C-130J飞机预测性维修中的应用与启示[J]. 航空维修与工程, 2022, 4: 21-24.
    [15] .U.S. Government Accountability Office. F-35 Sustainment: DOD Needs to Address Key Uncertainties as It Re-designs the Aircraft’s Logistics Systems [R]. GAO-20-665T. Washington, D.C.: July 22, 2020.
    [16] . 孔旭, 于得水, 丁坤英, 等. 航空器预测性维修技术研发应用态势分析[J]. 航空工程进展, 2021, 12(2): 21-29. KONG Xu, YU Deshui, DING Kunying, et al. Research and application trends of predictive techniques in aircraft maintenance [J]. Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering, 2021, 12(2): 21-29. (in Chinese)
    张宝珍,王萍.飞机PHM技术发展近况及在F-35应用中遇到的问题及挑战[J].航空科学技术,2020,31(07):18-26. Zhang Baozhen,Wang Ping. Recent development of aircraft PHM technology and problems and challenges encountered in the application on F-35[J].Aeronautical Science
    徐宗昌, 张永强, 呼凯凯, 等. 备件携行量研究方法综述[J]. 2016, 37(9): 2623-2633. XU Zongchang, ZHANG Yongqiang, HU Kaikai, et al. Survey on amount configuration methods of carrying spare parts [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2016, 37(9): 2623-2633. (in Chinese).
    朱斌,陈龙,强弢,等.美军F-35战斗机PHM体系结构分析[J].计算机测量与控制, 2015, 23(1): 1-4. Zhu Bin, Chen Long, Qiang Tao, et al. Analysis on PHM Architecture of US F-35 Fighter [J]. Computer Measurement
    邢鹏,贾希胜,郭驰名,等.面向故障预测与健康管理的传感器优化配置[J]. 火力与指挥控制,2021, 46(4):19-25. XING Peng, JIA Xisheng, GUO Chiming, et al. Research on Optimal Sensor Configuration for Fault-Oriented Prediction and Health Management [J] Fire Control
    王小巍, 陈砚桥, 金家善, 等. 备件需求预测中的不确定性问题研究综述[J].科学技术与工程, 2024, 24(4): 1338-1346. WANG Xiaowei, CHEN Yanqiao, JIN Jiashan, et al. Spare parts demand forecasting: a review on uncertainty problems [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2024, 24(4): 1338-1346. (in Chinese).
    闫洪胜,左洪福,孙见忠. 考虑预测与健康管理的民机维修成本效益仿真评估方法[J]. 南京航空航天大学学报,2020,52(6):912 ?922. YAN Hongsheng,ZUO Hongfu,SUN Jianzhong. Cost-benefit evaluation for aircraft maintenance based on prognostic and health management[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics
    孔祥芬, 蔡峻青, 张利寒, 等.大数据在航空系统的研究现状与发展趋势[J].航空学报, 2018, 39(12): 022311. KONG Xiangfen, CAI Junqing, ZHANG Lihan, et al. Research status and development trend of big data in aviation system [J]. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2018, 39(12): 022311 (in Chinese).
    WANG Shibin, TONG Chaowei, TAO Zhiyu, et al. Helicopter Health and Usage Monitoring System in China [J]. IEEE Instrumentation
    U.S. Government Accountability Office. Weapon System Sustainment: Aircraft Mission Capable Goals Were Generally Not Met and Sustainment Costs Varied by Aircraft [R]. GAO-23-106217. Washington, D.C.: Nov. 10, 2022.
    U.S. Government Accountability Office. F-35 Sustainment: DOD Faces Several Uncertainties and Has Not Met Key Objectives [R]. GAO-22-105995. Washington, D.C.: April. 28, 2022.
    U.S. Government Accountability Office. Military Readiness: Actions Needed to Further Implement Predictive Maintenance on Weapon Systems [R]. GAO-23-105556. Washington, D.C.: April. 28, 2022.
    Andreas Theissler, Judith Pérez-Velázquez, Marcel Kettelgerdes, et al. Predictive maintenance enabled by machine learning: Use cases and challenges in the automotive industry [J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 215 (2021) 107864.
    Iain G Hebden, Anthony M, Crowley. Wayne Black. Overview of the F-35 Structural Prognostics and Health Management System [C]. 9th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Manchester, United Kingdom, July 10-13, 2018.
    Patrick Mills, James A. Leftwich, John G. Drew, et al. Building Agile Combat Support Competencies to Enable Evolving Adaptive Basing Concepts [R]. Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif., 2020.
    Li Ang Zhang, Yusuf Ashpari, Anthony Jacques. Understanding the Limits of Artificial Intelligence for Warfighters, Volume 3: Predictive Maintenance [R]. Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif, 2024.
    Related
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:March 25,2024
  • Revised:June 01,2024
  • Adopted:June 04,2024
  • Online: April 02,2025
Article QR Code